5th March 2013 - Update from Police Commissioner Tony Lloyd since last letter from his office in January that said: “We are still awaiting GMPolice response and have chased up”…
We are now informed: “MP is best placed to help”- Is it to be assumed that GMPolice did not respond to the Commissioner? Why is the Commissioner referring back? ….
Have written back to obtain Police response…
10th January 2013- Update from Police Commissioner’s office since their representations in November #Justice4TrevorChappell
“We are still awaiting GMPolice response and have chased up”
…hope the wait brings the necessary answers #Justice
1. #GeneralMedicalCouncil expert states: “would be foolish to rule out assault, but there appears to be no evidence” #TrevorChappell
2. @ #GeneralMedicalCouncil
Answer=There is evidence, but only flawed #Police and #Pathologist reports have been given consideration #TrevorChappell
3. No documented evidence supplied by family has been reviewed #FlawedProcess #GeneralMedicalCouncil #TrevorChappell
4. Request for all data @ #GeneralMedicalCouncil has been blocked, being referred to make #FreedomOfInformation request #TrevorChappell
#HumanRights #RulesShouldBeForAll @JHart000
If they are stating Heart Attack and that it is not a suspicious death, why is there going to be an Inquest for #ChristopherShale ?
#TrevorChappell ’s family were told no inquest if Heart Failure documented….
Mr Chappell sustained wounds and injuries which remain undocumented by Pathologist and the cause of such have not been determined. What caused imprints and other wounds and injuries?
It appears there is to be an #Inquest in relation to Mr Shale to prevent speculation and so #Justice System appears to work and seen to be just….
Why #RulesForOne and not another?
No inquest, No answers - #HumanRights are for all:
Right to Life, Right to Investigation of Suspicious Death!
Answers = Justice & Peace
What really happened to Trevor Chappell on the 13th May 2010?
The questions of which answers are sought are those that most people would ask if faced with the same situation regarding a family member, friend- even a relative or friend of an Officer, Coroner, Pathologist, GMC, IPCC…, when met with considerable conflicting statements, undocumented material facts and a refusal to disclose records.
Why disregard wounds and injuries as if they did not exist, why not document them and determine the cause as is suppose to be standard procedure?
Questions @ MyPolice #FreedomofInformation -
@ mypolice Story: Seeking Answers for Justice #TrevorChappell :
whohub - Seeking Answers #Justice #HumanRights -
whohub Interview: Justice for Trevor Chappell
@helgaworotitjan In terms of what is known: There was previous police involvement on the day of his death. There is also history of land dispute difficulties, which he and his wife tried to resolve by putting the matter to be heard at County Court, but police officers prevented those proceedings from happening and a fair hearing, in that charges were made to criminalise matters before the civil proceedings got to court. After >3 years of fighting through ‘the system’ eventually the criminal charges were forced to be dropped as witnesses spoke, documents, receipts, bank statements and more to prove false allegations (dates, times, places (many miles away from place of allegations) were submitted over again. But because it was thwarted, the civil land matter remained (some officers had lived in the row of houses (Mr and Mrs Chappell didn’t know they were officers until they ‘acted’)) and wanted to privatise a communal right of way, but Mr and Mrs Chappell’s property deeds clearly show rights of all to use the shared pathway and outbuildings, one of which the Police Officer resident dismantled in anger of objections- privatising of what is legally communal was their motive and only priority. It was necessary for Mr Chappell to continue to, and he was legally entitled to, use the path out of the rear of his property, due to disability as it was flat with no steps. The path runs directly outside the back doors of the row of houses. At the time Mr and Mrs Chappell pursued all issues with IPCC, MP’s, Councillors and even wrote to Parliament, but nothing resulted. On the day of his death enquiries were made at the police station, the desk officer said there had been an altercation, this was later denied as being recorded. There has been refusal to application of police records. All is known is that his wounds and injuries are not consistent with what is recorded as the mode of death, records have been withheld and the pathologist has not recorded the significant wounds and injuries, why?? Does the background history have anything to do with what happened on the day of Mr Trevor Chappell’s death?